
The City of Yarra website announcing the removal of an historic elm avenue, claims that the 140 year old elms to be removed are ‘diseased’.

This is not supported by either their own arborist reports or independent arborist reports.
Dr Greg Moore
Rob Galbraith
Council’s Arborist Reports
Council commission a report from in 2021 and updated it in 2025. They can be found in council agenda papers. The 2025 report covers tree impacts from the latest changes to the design.
Urban Forestry Victoria P/L, Arboricultural Consultation
Arboricultural Impact Assessment
100 St Georges Rd, Fitzroy North VIC 3068
Date of Report 16/06/2025
Prepared by Urban Forestry Victoria Pty. Ltd.
The earlier report is
Urban Forestry Victoria P/L, Arboricultural Consultation
Arboricultural Construction Impact Assessment
Brunswick Street Oval Precinct
Date of Report 15/12/2021
Prepared for Site Image Landscape Architects
Neither report mentions disease. The tree numbering in each report is completely different. We will follow the numbering in the latter.
There are no changes in the reports status of the significant trees between these two reports.
Trees 8, 9 and 10 are proposed to be removed.
The 3068 Group has written to council about concerned for Tree 11.



The council report gives this tree moderate retention value, and acknowledges it will have significant encroachment if the project goes ahead as planned. The Big Green Circle on the plan represents this tree’s enormous canopy and natural root zone (NRZ). We can see works inside this zone including concrete pavement, timber decking and stairs, a perimeter fence and a 6m tall tennis court fence, a sand bocce court with park benches. The tree will need to be trimmed so it doesn’t overhang the new tennis court. These will need excavation likely to damage the old roots, and will be followed by compaction. The tennis court is marked as clay, but other reports indicate a concrete base and synthetic courts as these are preferred by more competitive players.

Above. From Town Planning Amendment 12.05.2025 Surface Finishes Plan, Drawing Number 2410_CD100B Rev A, Below is the Legend.

Tree 11 is a late mature, non-native English Elm (Ulmus procera) of medium retention value and high
significance located in the lawn area to the north of the existing pavilion. The tree is showing symptoms of
physiological decline. There are failed limbs throughout the canopy. There are cavities throughout the stem
and canopy. There is a cavity within the stem.
There is 25.3m2 existing semi-prohibitive encroachment within the NRZ.
Within the context of the proposed design the NRZ will incur a 102.6m2 (15%) encroachment from the proposed
a) Building, 11.72m2 (1.7%) prohibitive impact
b) Asphalt pavement, 8.30m2 (1.2%) semi-prohibitive impact
c) Concrete pavement, 44.13m2 (6.2%) semi-prohibitive impact
d) Granitic sand, 38.42m2 (5.4%) non-prohibitive impact
The type of NRZ area encroachment is moderate, in accordance with AS4970-2025.
The tree is proposed to be retained and will remain viable with general Tree Protection Specifications
Based on the outcome of the Impact Assessment, the TPZ is 17.5m. There is 120.2m2 of compensatory area
within the TPZ.
